When most people think of sponges, they think of the synthetic sponges that one might buy in a supermarket. I usually think of natural sponges. Natural sponges are a group of some of the simplest "complex" animals on the planet. Their simplicity certainly does not suggest any predation.
Below is an interesting article on how certain types of sponges are seriously impacting some coral reefs.
Osteoporosis in the World's Oceans: Bioeroding Sponges Are Threatening Coral Reefs
ScienceDaily (Sep. 19, 2012) — Due to the massive production of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide, our oceans are becoming increasingly acidic. Scientists of Senckenberg am Meer in Wilhelmshaven studied the consequences of ocean acidification on sponges that bore into calcareous materials such as coral skeletons. Results show that these sponges will profit from global changes, while coral reefs are threatened in their survival.
Share This:
See Also:
The study was published in the online journal PLoS ONE.
Increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide are not only changing the atmosphere, but also the oceans: Carbon dioxide reacts with water and forms carbonic acid, which acidifies the seas. The pH decreases simultaneously with this acidification, having mostly negative effects on many organisms in our oceans.
"Especially organisms that form calcareous skeletons, such as corals, will have to expend more energy in more acidic conditions," states Dr. Max Wisshak from Senckenberg am Meer in Wilhelmshaven. "In contrast -- so our hypothesis -- organisms that bioerode calcareous skeletons by biochemical etching should have an easier job in future and should thus be counted into the small circle of winners of the global change."
To test this hypothesis the team of scientists in collaboration with the Australian Institute of Marine Science and GEOMAR -- Helmholtz Centre for Oceanography in Kiel conducted elaborate experiments at the largest coral reef on earth, the Australian Great Barrier Reef, working with the bioeroding sponge Cliona orientalis. This demosponge is widely distributed, belongs to the most aggressive bioeroders, and will in future very likely contribute even more to the erosion of many coral skeletons in the Great Barrier Reef.
"We were able to confirm a clear relationship between the pH of the seawater and the bioerosion rate of these sponges," says Wisshak. "Our data predict an up to 25 percent increase of sponge bioerosion until end of this century!"
As bioeroding sponges often contribute the lion share of coral bioerosion on tropical reefs, with increasing ocean acidification the reefs will be exposed to a duplicate burden: calcification will be more difficult, and existing skeletons will be more strongly weakened by bioerosion. "This may lead to a shift from present-day positive reef growth to future negative budgets with stronger reef bioerosion. In consequence our reefs would be threatened by yet another stress factor," explains the marine geologist from Wilhelmshaven.
Testing effects of rising sea surface temperatures in the world's oceans -- another consequence of the present global change -- revealed a comparatively small influence on bioerosion rates of the sponges. What the sponges do not mind has a serious outcome for corals: Rising temperatures have a large impact on corals: Heat stress causes "bleaching" in corals, and in consequence they can die in dramatic mass mortality events.
The outcome of severe bleaching events is disastrous as reefs are home to many marine organisms and the basis of a complex food chain -- all the way up to humans.
Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:
Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:
Story Source:
The above story is reprinted from materials provided bySenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum.Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.
Journal Reference:
- Max Wisshak, Christine H. L. Schönberg, Armin Form, André Freiwald. Ocean Acidification Accelerates Reef Bioerosion. PLoS ONE, 2012; 7 (9): e45124 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0045124
Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.
Disclaimer: Views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.