Friday, April 27, 2012

Crown of Thorns

One might think this post is strangely titled, a Lenten blog entry during Eastertide?

It's not that Crown of Thorns, but the crown of thorns starfish, a consumer of coral reefs.  Below is an interesting article from a USC student.



Expeditions
Field notes from the far reaches of exploration
Expeditions HomeAboutContact

USC Dornsife Scientific Diving: Crown-of-Thorns Outbreaks and Anthropogenic Pollution



by Max Martinez
Coral reefs across the Indo-Pacific Ocean attract thousands of scuba divers from around the globe on an annual basis. However many of these highly diverse and biologically rich ecosystems are at a risk by a seemingly unlikely predator – the crown-of-thorns sea starAcanthaster planci, which makes a living by consuming the polyps of stony corals. Unlike its distant cousin the sun star Pycnopodia helianthoides(commonly found in the waters off Southern California), the surface of A. planci is covered in venomous thorn-like spines, which serve as an effective defense against potential predators (humans included!).
CAPTION: Crown-of-thorns sea star moving across coral rubble in the Ngederrak Marine Conservation Area, Koror State, Palau. (Photo by Jim Haw; May 2011)
CAPTION: Crown-of-thorns sea star moving across coral rubble in the Ngederrak Marine Conservation Area, Koror State, Palau. (Photo by Jim Haw; May 2011)
Under normal conditions, A. planci can help to improve coral reef biodiversity by eating a variety of fast-growing species of corals, giving the slower-growing ones an opportunity to reach full maturity. However an entire horde of these creatures has ability to devour several acres of reef in a single sitting (Birkeland & Lucas 1990).
Across the Pacific, recent studies suggest that select populations of crown-of-thorns are increasing at an alarming rate (Brodie et al. 2004). For example, more than one thousand A. planci have been found living on a discrete patch of reef at a single time (Keesing & Lucas 1992, Guam DAWR). Considering an individual can eat up to six square meters of living corals per year (Burdick et al. 2008), the potential threat that population outbreaks of crown-of-thorns impose on coral ecosystems is cause for concern.
Although the definitive cause of crown-of-thorns outbreaks is not fully understood there is little debate that blooms of A. planci have increased in both frequency and severity over the last several decades. One of the primary culprits of these outbreaks is attributed to the increasing problem of terrestrial runoff, which includes a concoction of nutrients, sediments, and pollutants that are regularly swept into coastal waters (Fabricius 2005).
Concomitantly, other factors believed to impact crown-of-thorns outbreaks include the removal of their natural predators, which in effect, has allowed them to feed on corals with impunity. On Guam, the most severe outbreaks are believed to arrive in the wake of severe storms such as heavy rains and typhoons (especially those following drought conditions) (Birkekand 1982). With more than 80% of the Guamanian population living along the island’s coastal zone (Burdick et al. 2008) the possibility that anthropogenic pollution can aggravate outbreaks must be addressed.
CAPTION: USC Student holding a Triton's trumpet snail on Guam during the 2010 expedition. (Photo by Jennah Caster)
CAPTION: USC Student holding a Triton's trumpet snail on Guam during the 2010 expedition. (Photo by Jennah Caster)
The two main predators of the crown-of-thorns on Guam’s reefs are the Triton’s trumpet snail (Charonia variegata) and the napoleon wrasse (Chelinus undulatus), both of which are heavily involved in marine trade despite being recognized as species in need of conservation and/or protection (Guam DAWR). “Curiosity kills the wrasse,” or so they say, as this large, slow-swimming fish is known to directly approach divers underwater, making it an easy dinner. The Triton’s trumpet shell is a highly prized commodity amongst the international shell trade – in some cases, fetching prices upwards of $150.
Overall, crown-of-thorns outbreaks are a major threat to the health of coral reef ecosystems and according to research done at the University of Guam Marine Lab, these population booms “have had, and are continuing to have, a severe impact on many Guam’s reefs” (Burdick et al. 2008, Guam DAWR). Urban runoff and overfishing also have the potential to destroy Guam’s reefs, especially considering that little of the island’s terrestrial and marine areas are protected by local and Federal law.
Works Cited:
Birkeland, CE (1982) Marine Biology 69:175
Birkeland, CE, Lucas JS (1990) CRC Press, Boca Raton, 257
Brodie, J et al. (2004) Marine Pollution Bulletin 51:9
Burdick, D et al. (2008) NOAA Technical Report
Brodie, J et al. (2004) Marine Pollution Bulletin 51:9
Burdick, D et al. (2008) NOAA Technical Report
Faabricius, KE (2005) Marine Pollution Bulletin 50:125
Guam DAWR: http://www.guamdawr.org/
Keesing J, Lucas JS (1992) Journal Experimental Marine Biology Ecology 156:89

Friday, April 13, 2012

More Tsunami Debris

It's slowly making its way across the Pacific Ocean.  Millions of tons of debris pulled out into the Pacific Ocean by the Great Tohoku tsunami.


Japan's Tsunami Debris Expected to Hit U.S. Shores
HONOLULU, Hawaii, April 12, 2012 (ENS) - The tsunami touched off by the 9.0 magnitude earthquake in Japan on March 11, 2011 swept about five million tons of debris into the Pacific Ocean, according to the Japanese government. About 70 percent sank off shore, leaving 1.5 million tons floating, Japanese officials say, but there is no estimate of how much debris is still floating today.
At first, the debris included everything from washed out houses, containers, small planes and fishing boats, to pieces of plastic, lumber, rubber, fabric, metal and glass. The heavier items sank close to shore; what stayed afloat has been pushed east and north by winds and currents.
Immediately after the event, satellite sensors focused on the area around Japan picked up tsunami debris. By April 14, 2011, the debris had dispersed to a point where the sensors could no longer detect it, but this doesn't mean it has vanished.
Debris from Japan's tsunami floats in the Pacific Ocean. (Photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Dylan McCord courtesy U.S. Navy)
Oceanographers believe it could begin washing ashore in Canada and the United States later this year or early 2013, but no one can predict exactly when or how much debris will make it across the Pacific.
While not radioactive, the tsunami debris is hazardous to navigation, to fishing vessels, to marine life, and when washed ashore, it is hazardous to coastal lands and waters.
To track where the tsunami debris is headed, a team of scientists and conservationists from the University of Hawaii, the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in California, and the Ocean Recovery Alliance created a plan to survey the debris and mark it with satellite-tracked drifting buoys.
At the end of November, the team organized an expedition from Honolulu westward to Midway Atoll and beyond. Eleven drifting buoys, designed to simulate the motion of different types of debris, were deployed in a line between Midway and the leading edge of the tsunami debris field.
Satellites are tracking the drifting buoys, and this data, combined with computer models, now allows the movement of the debris field to be monitored remotely, giving scientists and government agencies a better awareness of the status of the debris and of the region's winds and currents.
Among the most important results of the expedition was the recognition that tsunami debris had not advanced towards Midway Atoll in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands, but instead was flowing eastward to the north of these remote islands.
The flow also carries a lot of ordinary debris, mainly old plastic from the Garbage Patch, located between Hawaii and California. Examination of debris and water samples with a Geiger counter has not revealed any significant radiation.
In March, the governments of British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and California agreed to coordinate their individual tsunami debris cleanup efforts. They will communicate information to the public, ensure beach cleanups are done safely, and attempt to return anything of sentimental value to Japan.
To answer the questions about tsunami debris pouring in to nonprofit groups and government agencies, coastal communities are holding outreach meetings hosted by federal and state leaders.
Beginning April 11, organizations on the Oregon coast are partnering with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Oregon State University Extension, Oregon Sea Grant, state and local agencies, and conservation groups for a series of community meetings to share information and science about the tsunami debris.
"Right now, as a result of the tragic tsunami disaster, Brookings, Oregon is rebuilding, Japan is reeling and the West Coast states are preparing to clean up an unprecedented amount of debris being carried to our coast on the ocean currents," said Oregon's First Lady Cylvia Hayes.
"These workshops are important to helping us effectively deal with the tsunami debris and better protect the health of oceans and coastal communities," Hayes said.
SOLV, Surfrider Foundation, the CoastWatch program of the Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition, and the Washed Ashore Project are partnering with Oregon Sea Grant Extension to sponsor the information sessions.
The meetings will take place between April 11 and 20 in coastal communities from Port Orford to Seaside, and inland in Portland and Eugene.
Key speaker will be Nir Barnea, West Coast regional coordinator for NOAA's Marine Debris Program, who will describe what is known about the contents and trajectory of the debris and what is being done across the Pacific to prepare for it.
Barnea will be joined by representatives from the U.S. Coast Guard, Oregon Parks and Recreation Department, Oregon Health Authority Public Health Division, County Emergency Managers, and Oregon Department of Environmental Quality.
All events are free and open to the public. After presentations, people will have a chance to ask questions. For a list of meetings with times and places, visit www.solv.org.

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Japan Earthquake and Tsunami

A continuation of our discussion of tsunami debris from Japan during our chapter on circulation in the ocean.  The link will take you to NASA's Earth Observatory.  The references linked at the bottom are superb as well.

NASA Earth Observatory

May you and your families be most richly blessed as we will soon begin the Sacred Triduum and ultimately Easter Sunday.

Saturday, March 24, 2012

Mariana Trench - James Cameron


The bathyscaphe Trieste is pictured above.  It is the first and last manned submersible to visit the Challenger Deep.  James Cameron will most likely change that very, very soon.

Click the link to a phenomenal article by National Geographic about James Cameron's upcoming dive to the Challenger Deep.  The article has links to a few excellent videos and animations as well.  Exceptionally well done, so it's worth checking out.

National Geographic - James Cameron's Dive

Coastal Wetlands

Coastal wetlands are among the most productive biocommunities on earth.  The are a food source for local animals, they provide habitat for countless animals, and are vital "nurseries" for marine animals.  Mangrove trees form the framework for one of the two major types of coastal wetland.

Watch the short video below for a peek into this very very different world:

Sunday, March 11, 2012

One Year Later...

Estimated to be the costliest natural disaster in history (to date), the Great East Japan Earthquake took place one year ago.  Japan has been dealing with direct quake damage, multiple nuclear meltdowns, tsunami damage, approximately 15,000 fatalities, and social upheaval as a result of the thousands of displaced and evacuated citizens.

Say a prayer today for them all, giving thanks for the many blessings we have received.

Here's a link to a superb series of articles in Scientific American about the multifaceted disaster:
Scientific American - Japan Disaster

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Blue Whales

Blue whales, thought to be the largest animal ever to have lived, were intensely hunted due to their great size.  The article below shows the results of a study on Antarctic blue whales, the largest of all.

Genetic Survey of Endangered Antarctic Blue Whales Shows Surprising Diversity

ScienceDaily (Mar. 7, 2012) — More than 99 percent of Antarctic blue whales were killed by commercial whalers during the 20th century, but the first circumpolar genetic study of these critically endangered whales has found a surprisingly high level of diversity among the surviving population of some 2,200 individuals.
That, says lead author Angela Sremba of Oregon State University, may bode well for their future recovery.
Results of the study have just been published in the open-access journal,PLoS ONE. As part of the study, the researchers examined 218 biopsy samples collected from living Antarctic blue whales throughout the Southern Ocean from 1990 to 2009, through a project coordinated by the International Whaling Commission.
The genetic survey revealed a "surprisingly high" level of diversity that may help the population slowly rebound from its catastrophic decimation by whalers.
"Fewer than 400 Antarctic blue whales were thought to have survived when this population was protected from commercial hunting in 1966," noted Sremba, who conducted the research as part of her master's degree with the Marine Mammal Institute at OSU's Hatfield Marine Science Center. "But the exploitation period, though intense, was brief in terms of years, so the whales' long lifespans and overlapping generations may have helped retain the diversity."
"In fact," she added, "some of the Antarctic blue whales that survived the genetic bottleneck may still be alive today."
Prior to whaling Antarctic blue whales were thought to number about 250,000 individuals -- a total that dwindled to fewer than 400 animals by 1972 when blue whales were last killed by illegal Soviet whaling. Blue whales are thought to be the largest animals ever to have lived on Earth, said OSU's Scott Baker, associate director of the Marine Mammal Institute and an author on the study -- and the Antarctic blue whales were even larger than their cousins in other oceans.
"These animals are very long-lived -- maybe 70 to 100 years -- and they can grow to a length of more than 100 feet and weigh more than 330,000 pounds," he said. "There is a jawbone in a museum in South Africa that takes up most of the lobby. This is one reason they were so intensively exploited; they were the most valuable whales to hunt."
Despite their history of exploitation, little is known about modern-day movements of Antarctic blue whales, which are considered a separate subspecies -- differing in size and habitat use -- from the smaller "pygmy" blue whales, which live in more temperate regions of the Southern Hemisphere.
Through "microsatellite genotyping," or DNA fingerprinting, the PLoS ONE study was able to track some of the movements of individual Antarctic blue whales.
"We documented one female that traveled from one side of Antarctica to the other -- a minimum distance of more than 6,650 kilometers over a period of four years," said Sremba, who is now continuing her studies as a Ph.D. student in the Department of Fisheries and Wildlife at OSU. "It is the first documentation of individual movements by Antarctic blue whales since the end of the commercial whaling era."
Baker said the long distance movement of a few individuals was "somewhat surprising" in comparison to the evidence for genetic differences between areas of the Southern Ocean. On one hand, it is apparent that individual Antarctic blue whales are capable of traveling enormous distances in search of food.
"On the other hand," Baker said, "there seems to be some fidelity to the same feeding grounds as a result of a calf's early experience with its mother. This 'maternally directed' fidelity to migratory destinations seems to be widespread among great whales."
There is much, however, which scientists still don't know about Antarctic blue whales, Baker pointed out.
"This is a poorly understood species of whales, despite its history of exploitation," Baker said. "Only now are we developing the technology to study such a small number of whales spread across such a vast habitat."
The biopsy samples were collected during more than two decades of research cruises supervised by the International Whaling Commission, and with international scientists joining research vessels from the Japanese Ministry of Fisheries.
Now that their population is slowly recovering, future studies may focus on Antarctic blue whales' migration patterns, and the locations of their breeding and calving grounds.
Share this story on FacebookTwitter, and Google:
Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:
Digg StumbleUpon LinkedIn 
Reddit Slashdot Fark ShareThis

Story Source:
The above story is reprinted from materials provided byOregon State University.
Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.

Journal Reference:
  1. Angela L. Sremba, Brittany Hancock-Hanser, Trevor A. Branch, Rick L. LeDuc, C. Scott Baker. Circumpolar Diversity and Geographic Differentiation of mtDNA in the Critically Endangered Antarctic Blue Whale (Balaenoptera musculus intermedia)PLoS ONE, 2012; 7 (3): e32579 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032579
 APA

 MLA
Oregon State University (2012, March 7). Genetic survey of endangered Antarctic blue whales shows surprising diversity.ScienceDaily. Retrieved March 7, 2012, from http://www.sciencedaily.com­/releases/2012/03/120307184926.htm
Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.
Disclaimer: Views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.
Blue Whale Discovered Singing In New York Coastal Waters (May 30, 2009) — For the very first time in New York coastal waters, the voices of singing blue whales have been positively identified. Acoustic experts confirmed that the voice of a singing blue whale was tracked ...  > read more