Check out this "60-Second Science" clip at Scientific American podcast The podcast is about researches' findings regarding the relationship between mussel byssal strength and water temperature.
Sunday, February 24, 2013
Mussels
Check out this "60-Second Science" clip at Scientific American podcast The podcast is about researches' findings regarding the relationship between mussel byssal strength and water temperature.
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Great Tohoku Earthquake - Tsunami Debris
I read this interesting short piece from AccuWeather.com just a few minutes ago. We discussed earthquakes and tsunamis earlier this this year. Well, one aspect of that terrible event in Japan is the millions of tons of debris pulled out into the Pacific Ocean. In fact we highlighted this facet of tsunamis when we learned about ocean circulation. Remember the image below? This is NOAA's prediction model of the debris' travels.
This issue of tsunami debris affects not only coastal communities, but also shoreline biota - flora and fauna.
Photos courtesy of Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation
The beaches of Alaska are piled with debris from the tsunami that struck Japan on March 11, 2011, but restoration to their once pristine condition has slowed, as funding remains scarce.
"The amount of debris washing ashore has vastly exceeded most people's expectation...," said Chris Pallister, Vice President of the Gulf of Alaska Keeper, a non-profit organization dedicated to cleaning marine debris from the coastline of Alaska.
"As soon as the tsunami hit and we saw the videos, we knew the northern Gulf of Alaska shoreline was going to get inundated with tsunami debris," he said. "We said so at an international marine debris conference in March 2011. Our assertion was largely dismissed."
But Pallister's assertion has proved accurate as debris continues to wash ashore in massive quantities.
The debris is no longer only lightweight items such as water bottles and styrofoam. Beaches are now also littered with refrigerators, fuel tanks and other large objects.
Local landfills are struggling to find space for such a large volume of debris.
"We are all scrambling to come up with a solution for this," he said.
Additionally, most of the sites in need of clean up are remote and therefore more difficult and costly to tend to.
According to the Alaska Marine Stewardship Foundation, each of the five Pacific Coast states received $50,000 from the federal government for tsunami debris clean up. Additionally, the Japanese government has gifted the United States $5 million which is being administered by NOAA to individual states.
The Gulf of Alaska Keeper received $49 thousand last September from NOAA and the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation to remove the debris in the Prince William Sound (PWS).
The Sound clean up demonstrated how bad the situation truly is, Pallister said.
Pallister cites the arrival of tsunami debris as the third major environmental catastrophe the PWS has suffered in the past 50 years.
In 1964, an earthquake devastated PWS communities and natural habitats. The quake generated a tsunami that leveled communities and spread oil, fuel and debris throughout the sound from community crushed fuel depots and structures.
Then, in 1989, an oil spill occurred. "PWS has taken a beating to say the least," Pallister said.
NOAA has received approximately 1,519 official debris reports from across the country as of February 7, according to Keeley Belva, Public Affairs Officer at NOAA.
Only 21 of those items have been confirmed to be tsunami debris. NOAA relies on specific markings, such as japanese text, in order to identify debris. Items without such indications are not classified.
Though the amount of confirmed debris remains low, the Gulf of Alaska Keeper maintains that roughly 75 percent of the shoreline in Alaska has been impacted by tsunami debris.
Sunday, February 10, 2013
Happy Darwin Day
An excellent post from ScientificAmerican.com.
Darwin: Geologist First and Last
Share
Email
Print
(Happy Darwin Day! I figured today of all days would be a good one for reposting this from ETEV. It’s been slightly updated and modified from the original, in case you already knew Charles Darwin was a geologist (because you’ve read David Bressan’s post, right? Right??) and wish to spend your time playing spot-the-differences. Isn’t it nice to know the biologists don’t have dibs on one of the most famous scientists in history? Read up a bit, and then go have fun telling people at Darwin Day events that they really should’ve had a rock hammer on the celebratory cake as well.)
Shall we play a word-association game? I’ll say “Darwin.” And chances are, you’ll say “Origin of Species,” or “Evolution,” or “Biology.” Charles Darwin laid the foundation for modern biology. He changed our whole conception of how species come to be, why a single simple organism could be the root of a riotously-branching tree, how “from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being evolved.” Of course we associate him with biology. Rightly so.
But I have got a different word associated with him now: “Geology.”
Darwin was one hell of a biologist. But he began and finished with geology, and geology is at the heart of The Origin.
Darwin's "Tree of Life" Sketch. Image courtesy Wikimedia Commons.
“It is not too much to say that,” Cambridge geology professor John W. Judd said in his introduction to Darwin’s Geological Observations on South America, “had Darwin not been a geologist, the Origin of Species could never have been written by him.” Strong words, you say. Of course a geologist would be partial, but perhaps he overstates the case. Except. Except. Some of the most powerful arguments in The Origin are centered in geology. He understood the geologic record, and what that meant for the fossil record. He understood how geology impacted species. There, in chapters IX and X, taking center stage, is geology. No geology, no Origin – not as we know it.
Or perhaps I should say, no Lyell, no Origin. Because it was Charles Lyell and hisPrinciples of Geology that had the greatest influence on Darwin’s scientific thought. Darwin’s writings are liberally salted with paens to Lyell. In his Autobiography, he shows just how much influence Lyell had on his thinking, influence that led directly to the powerfully-organized arguments of The Origin: “After my return to England it appeared to me that by following the example of Lyell in Geology, and by collecting all facts which bore in any way on the variation of animals and plants under domestication and nature, some light might perhaps be thrown on the whole subject.”
Anyone who has read The Origin understands just how thorough Darwin was in collecting and marshaling his facts. One of the most critical facts was the immensity of the timescales involved. In Chapter IX, it becomes exquisitely clear that geology prepared Darwin’s mind for seeing those years in their uncountable millions. “It is hardly possible for me even to recall to the reader, who may not be a practical geologist, the facts leading the mind feebly to comprehend the lapse of time,” he wrote. “He who can read Sir Charles Lyell’s grand work on the Principles of Geology, which the future historian will recognise as having produced a revolution in natural science, yet does not admit how incomprehensibly vast have been the past periods of time, may at once close this volume.” Without an understanding of the age of the Earth, an understanding of evolution is impossible. We take it for granted now. Then, it was still a new idea, and without it, Darwin may have never been able to conceive of evolution as the engine of all the diversity of life.
Geology is intimately related to evolution. That is a fact that gets obscured; you don’t hear of Darwin as geologist in biology classes. He never got so much as a mention in my geology class; when I come across him in books on geology, it’s usually in reference to his work on evolution by way of explaining how fossils can be used for dating rocks. A person could be forgiven for thinking he was a biologist first and last. But his first passion was geology. Field observations on the geology he saw while sailing with theBeagle filled half his manuscript pages. Geology formed the subject for some of his first books: it comprises major portions of his Voyage of the Beagle; it helped build the foundation for The Origin; and in 1881, he returned to geology one again with his “The Formation of Vegetable Mould, through the Action of Worms” – a treatise on soils. He was a Fellow of the Geological Society of London. Geology was his first scientific love, and he returned to her again and again.
Without evolution, Darwin may not have achieved the same fame, but he wouldn’t have been forgotten. His contributions to geology were far from inconsequential. He laid some of the foundation stones for the young science. His work on coral reefs, his recognition that granitic rocks and lava rocks were essentially the same, his work on volcanic islands, and crustal movements in South America, would have ensured him a place among the giants of geology. Students may not have instantly recognized his name, and fundamentalist pastors may not have thundered against him, but he still would have been a recognized and respected scientist.
We’ll be exploring Darwin the Geologist in some depth in the future. And you can sail off on your own voyage of discovery – Sandra Herbert’s Charles Darwin, Geologistwill take you all over Darwin’s geologic world. By the end of the voyage, it’s my fondest hope that the next time we play the Darwin Word Association Game, you’ll shout “Geology!” without a second’s hesitation.
Darwin's Sketch of St. Helena Coastline, shamelessly pilfered from our own David Bressan.
Sources
Works by Charles Darwin:
Sir Archibald Giekie, Charles Darwin as geologist. The Rede lecture given at the Darwin centennial commemoration on 24 June 1909.
There’s music from Richard Einhorn’s oratorio The Origin over at ETEV, if you’d like some celebratory tunes. Gorgeous stuff!
About the Author: Dana Hunter is a science blogger, SF writer, and geology addict whose home away from SciAm is En Tequila Es Verdad. Follow her on Twitter: @dhunterauthor. Follow on Twitter @dhunterauthor.
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Surf's Up!!
Given our discussion of tsunamis lately, I thought this article from Geology.com to be timely. The article treats the 1700-foot tsunami that occurred in Lituya Bay, Alaska, in 1958. No, that should not be 170-ft. 1700-feet!!
Read on for more...
Geology.com - Largest Wave Article
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)