Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Coral Reef Surival

Coral species have proven resilient throughout a significant portion of earth's geologic history.  At times, coral has weathered "crises" due to fluctuations in climate and water conditions.

Will they survive the current fluctuations - natural and/or human-induced? A tough question to answer.  Read on for more info from the experts...


Coral Reef Emergency: 2,600 Scientists Call For Worldwide Rescue


Share4

CAIRNS, Australia, July 9, 2012 (ENS) - Coral reefs worldwide are being destroyed by changes in ocean temperature and chemistry faster than at any time since the last reef crisis 55 million years ago, thousands of marine scientists warned in a joint statement today.
"The future of coral reefs isn't a marine version of tree-hugging but a central problem for humanity," said Jeremy Jackson, senior scientist emeritus, Smithsonian Institution and the 2012 recipient of the Darwin Medal.
Black coral and barrel sponge on coral reef in the waters of the Caribbean island nation of Saint Lucia
(Photo © Chuck Savall / Marine Photobank)
Speaking at a coral reef symposium in Cairns held only once every four years, Jackson said today, "What's good for reefs is also critically important for people and we should wake up to that fact."
At the 12th International Coral Reef Symposium, Jackson was among 2,600 of the world's top marine researchers who released an unprecedented "Consensus Statement on Climate Change and Coral Reefs."
By consensus the scientists are urging a worldwide effort to overcome growing threats to coral ecosystems and to the livelihoods of millions of people who depend on them. It calls for measures to head off the escalating damage from rising sea temperatures that cause coral bleaching, ocean acidification, overfishing and pollution from the land.
Coral bleaching occurs when high water temperatures cause corals to expel their symbiotic algae; if prolonged or severe, it can kill the corals.
Jackson told delegates that in the Caribbean Sea, 75-85 percent of the coral cover has been lost in the last 35 years. Even the Great Barrier Reef, the world's best-protected reef ecosystem, has lost half its coral cover in the past 50 years, he said.
Climate change is pushing that decline and causing increased droughts, agricultural failure and sea level rise at increasingly faster rates that implies huge problems for societies, the scientists warn.
Coral reefs provide food and livelihood for tens of millions of coastal inhabitants around the world and function as natural breakwaters for waves and storms. Reefs provide an estimated US$170 to $375 billion in goods and services globally each year.
Healthy Pocillopora coral on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia (Photo © Pete Faulkner / Marine Photobank)
The consensus statement says that by the end of this century, emissions of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide at the current rate will warm sea surface temperatures by at least 2-3°C (3.6-5.4°F), raise sea-level by as much as 1.7 meters (5.7 feet), reduce ocean pH from 8.1 to less than 7.9 by dissolving additional carbon dioxide from the atmosphere in seawater, and increase storm frequency and/or intensity.
"There is a window of opportunity for the world to act on climate change - but it is closing rapidly," said Professor Terry Hughes, convener of the symposium and director of the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at James Cook University in Cairns.
"When it comes to coral reefs, prevention is better than cure," said Hughes. "If we look after the Great Barrier Reef better than we do now, it will continue to support a vibrant tourism industry into the future. Unfortunately, in Queensland, the rush to get as much fossil fuel out of the ground as quickly as possible, before the transition to alternative sources of energy occurs, has pushed environmental concerns far into the background."
"While there has been much progress in establishing marine reserves around the coastline of Australia, marine parks do not prevent pollution from the land, or lessen the impact of shipping and port developments, or reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases," said Hughes.
Stephen Palumbi, director of Stanford University's Hopkins Marine Station in California, said governments must make stronger commitments to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and meanwhile addressing local threats, such as poor land development and unsustainable fishing practices, can help by improving reef health.
"Local action buys us time to deal with the bigger issue of climate change," Palumbi said, urging rebuilding fish populations, reducing polluted runoff and establishing more marine protected areas.
A derelict fishing net discarded or lost at sea lies on a coral reef in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands, a U.S. Marine National Monument. (Photo courtesy NOAA/NMFS)
From the University of Hawaii, Robert Richmond, president of the International Society for Reef Studies, said the consensus statement is not just another document about the mounting problems facing coral reefs. Rather, it is focused on connecting the best available science with policy development and implementation through partnering with and supporting both elected officials and traditional leaders.
The five-day event at the Cairns Convention Centre is attended by more than 2,500 people from some 80 countries.
In the symposium's keynote address, the top U.S. oceans official announced a major advance in the ability to predict mass coral bleaching. The new seasonal ecological forecast system can forecast the probability of bleaching four months ahead.
Jane Lubchenco, under secretary of commerce for oceans and atmosphere and administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NOAA, said, "This advance in bleaching warning systems represents another milestone in our efforts to save the world's critically important reef systems."
NOAA's advances in satellite monitoring of the high ocean temperatures that can cause coral bleaching now provide daily five-kilometer satellite monitoring of coral bleaching thermal stress for reefs around the world. This means 100 times finer resolution, more frequent observations, and more data than the current twice-weekly 50-km global satellite coral bleaching monitoring.
Bleached coral on a Caribbean reef at Riviera Maya, Quintana Roo, Mexico (Photo © Christine Loew / Marine Photobank)
The new information products use a blend of data from NOAA and international partner environmental satellites that orbit the planet combined with data from geostationary weather satellites, providing 10 to 50 times more observations each day than the older products.
"The state of reefs today should raise concerns for everyone. Reef ecosystems are globally important, and healthy reefs are the life-line for local communities," said Lubchenco. "Their continued existence is a moral imperative for the global community."
A new report released at the symposium finds that up to 90 percent of reefs in the Coral Triangle are threatened by local human activities plus climate change - much more than the global average of 60 percent.
In the six countries that make up the Coral Triangle - Indonesia, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, Solomon Islands, and Timor-Leste - overfishing, watershed-based pollution, and coastal development as well as coral bleaching caused by warming ocean waters, are destroying the coral ecosystems.
The report, "Reefs at Risk Revisited in the Coral Triangle," was written by the World Resources Institute with the USAID-funded Coral Triangle Support Partnership. The partnership is a consortium of three large environmental groups WWF, The Nature Conservancy, and Conservation International that assists the six Coral Triangle governments in implementing their regional and national Coral Triangle Initiative plans of action.
The Coral Triangle contains nearly 30 percent of the world's coral reefs and more than 3,000 species of fish - twice the number found anywhere else in the world.
Spanning parts of insular Southeast Asia and the western Pacific, the Coral Triangle is recognized as the global center of marine biological diversity, with the highest coral diversity in the world - 76 percent of all coral species - as well as the highest diversity of coral reef fishes in the world - 37 percent of all species, according to the report.
Soft corals around Apo Island, Philippines have recovered after dynamite blasts due to local conservation efforts. (Photo by Arne Kuilman)
More than 130 million people living in the region rely on reef ecosystems for food, employment, and tourism revenue.
"The influence of coral reefs on the most important aspects of people's lives cannot be overstated," said Katie Reytar, research associate at World Resources Institute and a lead author of the report. "The influence extends far beyond the Coral Triangle to people around the world who benefit from the fisheries, tourism, medicines, and numerous other services that reefs provide."
The six Coral Triangle countries have signed and agreed to a regional plan of action called the Coral Triangle Initiative, a collaboration that aims to protect this area, and each has developed a national plan of action aligned with the regional plan.
Within the Coral Triangle Region, the Philippines is the most highly vulnerable country because of its highly threatened reefs, very high economic dependence on reefs, and low capacity to adapt to the loss of goods and services provided by reefs, the report finds.
The authors urge a halt to destructive fishing - the use of explosives and poisons to kill or capture fish, a common practice across much of the Coral Triangle Region, particularly in East Malaysia, the Philippines, and Indonesia, threatening nearly 60 percent of the region's reefs.
When conserved, coral reefs can recover, and the authors agree that healthy reefs are more likely to survive the negative effects of climate change, such as coral bleaching or slower coral growth due to increased ocean acidity. They, too, say that tackling the local threats first will buy reefs time until the global community can reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Thursday, July 5, 2012

Rio+20 And the World Ocean


Guitarfish, rays, and other bycatch are tossed from a shrimp boat.
Guitarfish, rays, and other bycatch are tossed from a shrimp boat.
Photograph by Brian Skerry, National Geographic
Brian Clark Howard in Rio de Janeiro
Published June 22, 2012
In an email to National Geographic News from Rio de Janeiro, National Geographic Explorer-in-Residence Sylvia Earle said of the ongoing UN Conference on Sustainable Development, "Concerning oceans, there is reason to suggest that the outcomes could be characterized as Rio+20 minus 40." (National Geographic News is owned by the National Geographic Society.)
Earle's words sum up the buzz in the halls of Riocentro—the massive suburban conference center that has hosted tens of thousands of delegates, activists, and journalists this week—as well as among the thousands of protesters that have taken the streets around the Marvelous City.
Still, Earle pointed out, "It is not all bad news, just discouraging to hear the French ambassador say that the will of 183 countries concerning developing a framework for governance of the high seas had come unglued owing to opposition from a small number of powerful countries."
Earle is referring to the United States, Russia, Canada, and Venezuela in particular, who, according to reports, moved to block specific rulemaking on environmental protections in international waters during late-night, closed-door negotiations earlier this week.
Expressing his disappointment, Kumi Naidoo, executive director of Greenpeace International, told the Guardian, "What kept Greenpeace in the [Rio+20 negotiations] was that it looked like we could get a decent deal on the oceans, but we have now got a really watered-down text that has very little teeth."
Earle said she believes the U.S. government is resistant to start negotiations on a new international oceans treaty, since there has been recent movement to ratify the Law of the Sea Treaty, an international agreement that went into effect in 1994 but counts the U.S. as one of a handful of holdout countries. The Law of the Sea Treaty does include some environmental guidelines, but not as many specific protections as Earle would like.
Earle added that the U.S. also has concerns about fishing interests and is worried about the United Nations gaining authority over U.S. interests, although, she said, the aim of Rio+20 talks was not to put the high seas under UN jurisdiction, but to establish a framework for international governance.
"Presently the High Seas, nearly half the planet, is like the Wild West, and a few industrial fishers from a few countries are wrecking entire ecosystems and depleting species already in serious trouble," said Earle. "In my remarks [at a Rio+20 panel discussion] yesterday, I used [IUCN marine protected areas expert] Dan Laffoley's comment that we should call this a 'Half the Earth summit,' since the blue half—the high seas—are being seriously neglected."
Also speaking to National Geographic News from Rio, Susan Lieberman, deputy director of international policy for Pew Environment Group, said, "We came to Rio with high expectations for action to address the ocean crisis. For a once-in-a-decade meeting where so much was at stake, Rio was a far cry from a resounding success. The lack of progress on managing the high seas, which can and will only be addressed through international action, is discouraging and should have been dealt with here and now.
"It is frankly astonishing that world leaders all agreed this is a major problem needing an international, coordinated solution and then deferred any decision on action for another two and a half years. The future of life in the sea does not need more bureaucratic infighting," said Lieberman.
Some Progress Made
Still, Lieberman saw some positive developments in Rio. "The final-outcome document contains good recommendations on ending overfishing, taking action to stop illegal fishing, phasing out harmful subsidies, eliminating destructive fishing practices, and protecting vulnerable marine ecosystems," she said.
Lieberman added that there was a decision to make regulating the catch of commercial species like tuna more transparent, although it will be up to governments to put those regulations into place.
National Geographic's Earle said, "The good news is that the Rio+20 conference may be more important for the enhanced exposure given to ocean issues and other topics not covered 20 years ago," during the first Earth Summit in Rio. "Meetings over coffee, on the transport buses, and in hallways, bars, and beaches are likely to be more meaningful concerning policies that will endure than all of the exquisitely orchestrated formalities."
Earle pointed to major commitments from the Maldives and Australia for large protected areas within their exclusive economic zones.
She also pointed to the high amount of public participation in Rio+20, including the fact that people from 163 countries submitted nearly a million and a half votes online about environmental issues they wanted to see discussed.
"The conference has been a celebration of knowing that nature matters—for business, industry, health, security, and every breath we take, every drop of water we drink," said Earle. "Whether the political leaders endorse what the people are saying or not is not as important as the lift this conference has given to the growing awareness that the planet has limits."
Earle added that 20 years ago scientists did not have nearly as much data or insight about the environment. She called the current moment a "sweet spot," and warned that it will soon be too late to take action to reverse the increase of carbon dioxide, ocean acidification, ocean dead zones, deforestation, plastic pollution, mass extinctions, and so on.
"Too Big to Fail"
Earle said a highlight of the dialogues on oceans she participated in this week in Rio was when one panelist said, "We have to get over the idea that the ocean is 'too big to fail'"—that it will survive and thrive no matter what.
She added that ocean explorer Jean-Michel Cousteau said there are just three things that will save the ocean and ourselves: "Education, education, education!"
One panelist, concerned that fishing interests were under-represented, asked anyone in the audience who made their living as a fishermen to stand up.
No one did. But then Earle asked all of the fish in the audience to please stand up. "We were determining their fate, after all, but I didn't see them at the table.  Only on the table," Earle reflected.
Pew's Lieberman told National Geographic News, "I wouldn't call Rio a total failure, because a large number of countries recognize the need for international management of the sea, and there were commitments to deal with some of the key issues that are accelerating the deterioration of the marine environment."

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Just How Much Carbon Can They Absorb?

That is a question oceanographers have been attempting to answer.  How much carbon can the oceans absorb before significant acidification takes place.  What in turn will the effect on marine life be?  Check out a novel experiment in the article below.


Predicting the Oceans of the Future With a Mini-Lab

ScienceDaily (June 7, 2012) — Stanford researchers have helped open a new door of possibility in the high-stakes effort to save the world's coral reefs.
Working with an international team, the scientists -- including Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment Senior Fellows Jeff Koseff, Rob Dunbar and Steve Monismith -- found a way to create future ocean conditions in a small lab-in-a-box in Australia's Great Barrier Reef. The water inside the device can mimic the composition of the future ocean as climate change continues to alter Earth.
Inside the mini-lab, set in shallow water 2 to 6 feet deep, elevated levels of water acidity were created to test the reaction of a few local corals. (Other corals in the vicinity were not adversely affected.)
It was the first controlled ocean acidification experiment in shallow coastal waters. The scientists' study, published inScientific Reports, describes how they simulated predicted future ocean conditions off Heron Island in Australia's Great Barrier Reef, representing a new paradigm for analyzing how reefs respond to ocean acidification. David Kline and Ove Hoegh-Guldberg at the University of Queensland led the project.
Focusing conservation efforts
"Installing systems like this at reefs and other aquatic environments could be instrumental in helping us identify how ecosystems will change and which locations and ecosystem types are more likely to remain robust and resilient," said Lida Teneva, a Stanford doctoral student studying with Dunbar.
"From this, we can determine which habitats to focus our conservation efforts on as strongholds for the future," Teneva said.
Oceans absorb more than a quarter of all atmospheric carbon dioxide, concentrations of which are increasing at a rate twice as fast as at any time in the past 800,000 years or more. This leads to increasingly intense water acidification and widespread coral reef destruction. The potential loss is tremendous: reefs provide aquaculture, protein and storm protection for about 1 billion people worldwide.
Standard in situ studies of ocean acidification have multiple drawbacks, including a lack of control over treatment conditions and a tendency to expose organisms to more extreme and variable pH levels than those predicted in the next century. So, in 2007, the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute developed a system that allows for highly controlled semi-enclosed experiments in the deep sea. For their recent study, Stanford researchers modified the system for use in coral reefs.
The complex device, the Coral Proto -- Free Ocean Carbon Enrichment (CP-FOCE) system, uses a network of sensors to monitor water conditions and maintain experimental pH levels as offsets from environmental pH. It avoids many of the problems associated with standard in situ ocean acidification studies, and -- unlike lab and aquarium experiments -- makes it possible to study amid natural conditions such as seasonal environmental changes and ambient seawater chemistry.
The study was funded by the Australian Research Council, the Queensland Government, the National Science Foundation and the Pacific Blue Foundation.
Share this story on FacebookTwitter, and Google:
Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

Story Source:
The above story is reprinted from materials provided byStanford University. The original article was written by Rob Jordan, communications writer for the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment.
Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.

Journal Reference:
  1. David I. Kline, Lida Teneva, Kenneth Schneider, Thomas Miard, Aaron Chai, Malcolm Marker, Kent Headley, Brad Opdyke, Merinda Nash, Matthew Valetich, Jeremy K. Caves, Bayden D. Russell, Sean D. Connell, Bill J. Kirkwood, Peter Brewer, Edward Peltzer, Jack Silverman, Ken Caldeira, Robert B. Dunbar, Jeffrey R. Koseff, Stephen G. Monismith, B. Greg Mitchell, Sophie Dove, Ove Hoegh-Guldberg. A short-term in situ CO2 enrichment experiment on Heron Island (GBR)Scientific Reports, 2012; 2 DOI: 10.1038/srep00413
 APA

 MLA
Stanford University (2012, June 7). Predicting the oceans of the future with a mini-lab.ScienceDaily. Retrieved June 20, 2012, from http://www.sciencedaily.com­/releases/2012/06/120607092857.htm
Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.
Disclaimer: Views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Sunday, June 17, 2012

More Climate Change?

The climate change debate remains contentious especially with seemingly contradictory evidence presented by parties of differing opinion.

Some of the most important evidence calls to mind Chapter 4 from earlier this year - our chapter on seafloor sediments.  Phylum Foraminifera includes about 275,000 species, extant and fossil.  They are calcareous protists that are susceptible to changes in ocean temperatures.  An article to the same effect from ScienceDaily.com follows.


Warm Climate -- Cold Arctic?

ScienceDaily (June 14, 2012) — The Eemian interglacial period that began some 125,000 years ago is often used as a model for contemporary climate change. In the international journal "Geophysical Research Letters" scientists from Mainz, Kiel and Potsdam (Germany) now present evidence that the Eemian differed in essential details from modern climatic conditions.
To address the question about how climate may develop in the future, earth scientists direct their attention to the past. They look for epochs with similar conditions to today. The major identified climatic processes are then simulated with numerical models to further test possible reactions of the Earths' system.
An epoch which is often regarded suitable for such an undertaking is the Eemian warm period, which began around 125,000 years ago following the Saalian ice age. For about 10,000 years, average temperatures on Earth in the Eemian were rather enhanced -- probably several degrees above today's level. This seems to be well documented in both ice cores as well as terrestrial records from land vegetation. Substantial parts of the Greenland ice had melted, and global sea level was higher than today. "Therefore, the Eemian time is suited apparently so well as a basis for the topical issue of climate change," says Dr Henning Bauch, who works for the Academy of the Sciences and the Literature Mainz (AdW Mainz) at GEOMAR | Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel.
However, in a study which appears in the recent issue of the international journal "Geophysical Research Letters" Dr Bauch, Dr Evgeniya Kandiano of GEOMAR as well as Dr Jan Helmke of the Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies in Potsdam now show that the Eemian warm period differed from the present day situation in one critical aspect -- the development in the Arctic Ocean.
In our current warm period, also called Holocene, oceanic and atmospheric circulation delivers large amounts of heat northward into the high latitudes. The most well known heat conveyer is the Gulf Stream and its northern prolongation called the North Atlantic Drift. The currents provide not only the pleasant temperatures in Northern Europe, they also reach as far as the Arctic. Studies in the last years have shown that the oceanic heat transport to the Arctic has even increased, while the summer sea ice cover in the Arctic Ocean seems to be decreasing continuously. It has long been assumed that such conditions also prevailed 125,000 years ago. Accordingly, the Arctic should have been by and large ice-free in the Eemian summers.
Dr Bauch's group examined sediment cores from the seabed in which information about the climate history of the past 500,000 years is stored. These come from the Atlantic to the west of Ireland and from the central Nordic Seas to the east of the island of Jan Mayen. The sediments contain minute calcite tests of dead microorganisms (foraminifers). "The type of species assemblage in the respective layers as well as the isotopic composition of the calcitic tests give us information about temperature and other properties of the water in which they lived at that time," explains Dr Bauch.
The samples from the Atlantic delivered the higher-than-Holocene temperature signals so typical for the Eemian. The tests from the Nordic Seas, however, tell quite another story. "The found foraminifers of Eemian time indicate comparatively cold conditions." The isotope investigations of the tests, in combination with previous studies of the group, "indicate major contrasts between the ocean surfaces of these two regions ," according to Dr Bauch. "Obviously, the warm Atlantic surface current was weaker in the high latitude during the Eemian than today." His explanation: "The Saalian glaciation which preceded the Eemian was of much bigger extent in Northern Europe than during the Weichselian, the ice age period before our present warm interval. Therefore, more fresh water from the melting Saalian ice sheets poured into the Nordic Seas, and for a longer period of time. This situation had three consequences: The oceanic circulation in the north was reduced, and winter sea ice was more likely to form because of lower salinity. At the same time, this situation led to a kind of 'overheating' in the North Atlantic due to a continuing transfer of ocean heat from the south."
On the one hand, the study introduces new views on the Eemian climate. On the other hand, the new results have consequences for climatology in general: "Obviously, some decisive processes in the Eemian ran off differently, like the transfer of ocean warmth towards the Arctic. Models should take this into consideration if they want to forecast the future climate development on the basis of past analogues like the Eemian ," says Dr Bauch.
Share this story on FacebookTwitter, and Google:
Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

Story Source:
The above story is reprinted from materials provided byHelmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR).
Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.

Journal Reference:
  1. Henning A. Bauch, Evguenia S. Kandiano, Jan P. Helmke.Contrasting ocean changes between the subpolar and polar North Atlantic during the past 135 kaGeophysical Research Letters, 2012; 39 (11) DOI:10.1029/2012GL051800
 APA

 MLA
Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (2012, June 14). Warm climate -- cold Arctic?. ScienceDaily. Retrieved June 17, 2012, from http://www.sciencedaily.com­/releases/2012/06/120614130944.htm
Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.
Disclaimer: Views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Monday, June 4, 2012

Transit of Venus Tomorrow



Just a reminder, gentlemen, that tomorrow will be the 2nd and last opportunity of our lifetimes to view a transit of Venus.  The transit will begin at 6:04 EDT, and will be visible through sunset tomorrow.  We will not have the opportunity to see the entire phenomenon.

In case the weather doesn't cooperate, which is looking likely at this point, here are a few helpful websites.

Sky & Telescope - Transit Article and Viewing Tips

W.M. Keck Observatory - Live Web Stream for Transit  Click on the homepage's link to the live stream of the transit tomorrow.

NASA - Official Webpage for Transit of Venus  There are multiple links to live streams of tomorrow's  transit.

If you don't have safe viewing equipment, consider making a pinhole camera for safely viewing the transit tomorrow.  Pinhole Camera Directions (Latin = Camera Obscura)  ALWAYS BE OVERLY CAUTIOUS ABOUT OBSERVING THE SUN; YOU CAN QUICKLY DO PERMANENT DAMAGE TO YOUR EYES!


To build the simplest pinhole camera of all, you need two sheets of heavy paper.  Poke a pinhole in one sheet (or use a piece of carboard and some aluminum foil).  Use the 2nd sheet of white paper as your "projection screen."  Change the distance between the two to bring the image into focus.  You can use your pinhole camera to make cool images of many things in nature, including trees and other shadows.

In addition, you can project an image of the sun onto a piece of paper using a pair of binoculars.
NEVER LOOK DIRECTLY AT THE SUN THROUGH BINOCULARS OR A TELESCOPE WITHOUT THE PROPER FILTERS.

Good luck!

Friday, June 1, 2012

Transit of Venus - 2012


Just a reminder that the 2nd and last transit of Venus during our lifetimes will take place this coming Tuesday.  The ingress of the transit will begin at 6:04 pm on Tuesday, June 5.  We will be able to view it until sunset, approximately 2 hours later.

Here's a link to another NASA webpage about the transit.  NASA - Transit of Venus

In order to safely view the transit, you need either #14 welder's glass or special eclipse filters.  Be very careful when observing the sun.

The next transit of Venus will take place in 2117.