Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Just How Much Carbon Can They Absorb?

That is a question oceanographers have been attempting to answer.  How much carbon can the oceans absorb before significant acidification takes place.  What in turn will the effect on marine life be?  Check out a novel experiment in the article below.


Predicting the Oceans of the Future With a Mini-Lab

ScienceDaily (June 7, 2012) — Stanford researchers have helped open a new door of possibility in the high-stakes effort to save the world's coral reefs.
Working with an international team, the scientists -- including Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment Senior Fellows Jeff Koseff, Rob Dunbar and Steve Monismith -- found a way to create future ocean conditions in a small lab-in-a-box in Australia's Great Barrier Reef. The water inside the device can mimic the composition of the future ocean as climate change continues to alter Earth.
Inside the mini-lab, set in shallow water 2 to 6 feet deep, elevated levels of water acidity were created to test the reaction of a few local corals. (Other corals in the vicinity were not adversely affected.)
It was the first controlled ocean acidification experiment in shallow coastal waters. The scientists' study, published inScientific Reports, describes how they simulated predicted future ocean conditions off Heron Island in Australia's Great Barrier Reef, representing a new paradigm for analyzing how reefs respond to ocean acidification. David Kline and Ove Hoegh-Guldberg at the University of Queensland led the project.
Focusing conservation efforts
"Installing systems like this at reefs and other aquatic environments could be instrumental in helping us identify how ecosystems will change and which locations and ecosystem types are more likely to remain robust and resilient," said Lida Teneva, a Stanford doctoral student studying with Dunbar.
"From this, we can determine which habitats to focus our conservation efforts on as strongholds for the future," Teneva said.
Oceans absorb more than a quarter of all atmospheric carbon dioxide, concentrations of which are increasing at a rate twice as fast as at any time in the past 800,000 years or more. This leads to increasingly intense water acidification and widespread coral reef destruction. The potential loss is tremendous: reefs provide aquaculture, protein and storm protection for about 1 billion people worldwide.
Standard in situ studies of ocean acidification have multiple drawbacks, including a lack of control over treatment conditions and a tendency to expose organisms to more extreme and variable pH levels than those predicted in the next century. So, in 2007, the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute developed a system that allows for highly controlled semi-enclosed experiments in the deep sea. For their recent study, Stanford researchers modified the system for use in coral reefs.
The complex device, the Coral Proto -- Free Ocean Carbon Enrichment (CP-FOCE) system, uses a network of sensors to monitor water conditions and maintain experimental pH levels as offsets from environmental pH. It avoids many of the problems associated with standard in situ ocean acidification studies, and -- unlike lab and aquarium experiments -- makes it possible to study amid natural conditions such as seasonal environmental changes and ambient seawater chemistry.
The study was funded by the Australian Research Council, the Queensland Government, the National Science Foundation and the Pacific Blue Foundation.
Share this story on FacebookTwitter, and Google:
Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

Story Source:
The above story is reprinted from materials provided byStanford University. The original article was written by Rob Jordan, communications writer for the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment.
Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.

Journal Reference:
  1. David I. Kline, Lida Teneva, Kenneth Schneider, Thomas Miard, Aaron Chai, Malcolm Marker, Kent Headley, Brad Opdyke, Merinda Nash, Matthew Valetich, Jeremy K. Caves, Bayden D. Russell, Sean D. Connell, Bill J. Kirkwood, Peter Brewer, Edward Peltzer, Jack Silverman, Ken Caldeira, Robert B. Dunbar, Jeffrey R. Koseff, Stephen G. Monismith, B. Greg Mitchell, Sophie Dove, Ove Hoegh-Guldberg. A short-term in situ CO2 enrichment experiment on Heron Island (GBR)Scientific Reports, 2012; 2 DOI: 10.1038/srep00413
 APA

 MLA
Stanford University (2012, June 7). Predicting the oceans of the future with a mini-lab.ScienceDaily. Retrieved June 20, 2012, from http://www.sciencedaily.com­/releases/2012/06/120607092857.htm
Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.
Disclaimer: Views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Sunday, June 17, 2012

More Climate Change?

The climate change debate remains contentious especially with seemingly contradictory evidence presented by parties of differing opinion.

Some of the most important evidence calls to mind Chapter 4 from earlier this year - our chapter on seafloor sediments.  Phylum Foraminifera includes about 275,000 species, extant and fossil.  They are calcareous protists that are susceptible to changes in ocean temperatures.  An article to the same effect from ScienceDaily.com follows.


Warm Climate -- Cold Arctic?

ScienceDaily (June 14, 2012) — The Eemian interglacial period that began some 125,000 years ago is often used as a model for contemporary climate change. In the international journal "Geophysical Research Letters" scientists from Mainz, Kiel and Potsdam (Germany) now present evidence that the Eemian differed in essential details from modern climatic conditions.
To address the question about how climate may develop in the future, earth scientists direct their attention to the past. They look for epochs with similar conditions to today. The major identified climatic processes are then simulated with numerical models to further test possible reactions of the Earths' system.
An epoch which is often regarded suitable for such an undertaking is the Eemian warm period, which began around 125,000 years ago following the Saalian ice age. For about 10,000 years, average temperatures on Earth in the Eemian were rather enhanced -- probably several degrees above today's level. This seems to be well documented in both ice cores as well as terrestrial records from land vegetation. Substantial parts of the Greenland ice had melted, and global sea level was higher than today. "Therefore, the Eemian time is suited apparently so well as a basis for the topical issue of climate change," says Dr Henning Bauch, who works for the Academy of the Sciences and the Literature Mainz (AdW Mainz) at GEOMAR | Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel.
However, in a study which appears in the recent issue of the international journal "Geophysical Research Letters" Dr Bauch, Dr Evgeniya Kandiano of GEOMAR as well as Dr Jan Helmke of the Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies in Potsdam now show that the Eemian warm period differed from the present day situation in one critical aspect -- the development in the Arctic Ocean.
In our current warm period, also called Holocene, oceanic and atmospheric circulation delivers large amounts of heat northward into the high latitudes. The most well known heat conveyer is the Gulf Stream and its northern prolongation called the North Atlantic Drift. The currents provide not only the pleasant temperatures in Northern Europe, they also reach as far as the Arctic. Studies in the last years have shown that the oceanic heat transport to the Arctic has even increased, while the summer sea ice cover in the Arctic Ocean seems to be decreasing continuously. It has long been assumed that such conditions also prevailed 125,000 years ago. Accordingly, the Arctic should have been by and large ice-free in the Eemian summers.
Dr Bauch's group examined sediment cores from the seabed in which information about the climate history of the past 500,000 years is stored. These come from the Atlantic to the west of Ireland and from the central Nordic Seas to the east of the island of Jan Mayen. The sediments contain minute calcite tests of dead microorganisms (foraminifers). "The type of species assemblage in the respective layers as well as the isotopic composition of the calcitic tests give us information about temperature and other properties of the water in which they lived at that time," explains Dr Bauch.
The samples from the Atlantic delivered the higher-than-Holocene temperature signals so typical for the Eemian. The tests from the Nordic Seas, however, tell quite another story. "The found foraminifers of Eemian time indicate comparatively cold conditions." The isotope investigations of the tests, in combination with previous studies of the group, "indicate major contrasts between the ocean surfaces of these two regions ," according to Dr Bauch. "Obviously, the warm Atlantic surface current was weaker in the high latitude during the Eemian than today." His explanation: "The Saalian glaciation which preceded the Eemian was of much bigger extent in Northern Europe than during the Weichselian, the ice age period before our present warm interval. Therefore, more fresh water from the melting Saalian ice sheets poured into the Nordic Seas, and for a longer period of time. This situation had three consequences: The oceanic circulation in the north was reduced, and winter sea ice was more likely to form because of lower salinity. At the same time, this situation led to a kind of 'overheating' in the North Atlantic due to a continuing transfer of ocean heat from the south."
On the one hand, the study introduces new views on the Eemian climate. On the other hand, the new results have consequences for climatology in general: "Obviously, some decisive processes in the Eemian ran off differently, like the transfer of ocean warmth towards the Arctic. Models should take this into consideration if they want to forecast the future climate development on the basis of past analogues like the Eemian ," says Dr Bauch.
Share this story on FacebookTwitter, and Google:
Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

Story Source:
The above story is reprinted from materials provided byHelmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR).
Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.

Journal Reference:
  1. Henning A. Bauch, Evguenia S. Kandiano, Jan P. Helmke.Contrasting ocean changes between the subpolar and polar North Atlantic during the past 135 kaGeophysical Research Letters, 2012; 39 (11) DOI:10.1029/2012GL051800
 APA

 MLA
Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (2012, June 14). Warm climate -- cold Arctic?. ScienceDaily. Retrieved June 17, 2012, from http://www.sciencedaily.com­/releases/2012/06/120614130944.htm
Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.
Disclaimer: Views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Monday, June 4, 2012

Transit of Venus Tomorrow



Just a reminder, gentlemen, that tomorrow will be the 2nd and last opportunity of our lifetimes to view a transit of Venus.  The transit will begin at 6:04 EDT, and will be visible through sunset tomorrow.  We will not have the opportunity to see the entire phenomenon.

In case the weather doesn't cooperate, which is looking likely at this point, here are a few helpful websites.

Sky & Telescope - Transit Article and Viewing Tips

W.M. Keck Observatory - Live Web Stream for Transit  Click on the homepage's link to the live stream of the transit tomorrow.

NASA - Official Webpage for Transit of Venus  There are multiple links to live streams of tomorrow's  transit.

If you don't have safe viewing equipment, consider making a pinhole camera for safely viewing the transit tomorrow.  Pinhole Camera Directions (Latin = Camera Obscura)  ALWAYS BE OVERLY CAUTIOUS ABOUT OBSERVING THE SUN; YOU CAN QUICKLY DO PERMANENT DAMAGE TO YOUR EYES!


To build the simplest pinhole camera of all, you need two sheets of heavy paper.  Poke a pinhole in one sheet (or use a piece of carboard and some aluminum foil).  Use the 2nd sheet of white paper as your "projection screen."  Change the distance between the two to bring the image into focus.  You can use your pinhole camera to make cool images of many things in nature, including trees and other shadows.

In addition, you can project an image of the sun onto a piece of paper using a pair of binoculars.
NEVER LOOK DIRECTLY AT THE SUN THROUGH BINOCULARS OR A TELESCOPE WITHOUT THE PROPER FILTERS.

Good luck!

Friday, June 1, 2012

Transit of Venus - 2012


Just a reminder that the 2nd and last transit of Venus during our lifetimes will take place this coming Tuesday.  The ingress of the transit will begin at 6:04 pm on Tuesday, June 5.  We will be able to view it until sunset, approximately 2 hours later.

Here's a link to another NASA webpage about the transit.  NASA - Transit of Venus

In order to safely view the transit, you need either #14 welder's glass or special eclipse filters.  Be very careful when observing the sun.

The next transit of Venus will take place in 2117.